WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kan.), and Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) are demanding answers from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding its failure to prevent the nationwide baby formula shortage. The senators are also demanding to know when the White House was made aware of the dire situation and what steps are available to limit the harmful impact on families and their newborns.

While Biden finally invoked the Defense Production Act, his administration’s inaction brought us to where we are today — a full-blown crisis. The senators stressed the desperation felt by families with infant children and expressed frustration over the lack of urgent action to resolve this crisis in a new letter to FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, M.D., writing in part,

“Infant formula supplies at local grocery stores were relatively stable for the first half of 2021. The out-of-stock percentage started to climb steadily in the later half and continued to worsen throughout this year. It’s concerning that FDA and key officials in the Administration did not anticipate this crisis or take action within days following Abbott Nutrition’s voluntary recall considering the company holds 48.1 percent of the U.S. market in infant formula. Families are getting to the brink of pursuing unsafe and potentially dangerous options to feed their infants including homemade infant formula. And physicians are, once again, running defense on misinformation due to a lack of federal action to get the word out on safe alternatives,” the senators wrote.

Senators Susan Collins (R-Maine), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), John Barrasso, M.D. (R-Wyo.), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), John Boozman (R-Ark.), Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-La.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), John Thune (R-S.D.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), and John Kennedy (R-La.) also signed the letter.

The text of the senators’ full letter to the FDA is available below or can be read online by clicking HERE.

May 18, 2022

The Honorable Robert Califf, M.D.                                                                          

Commissioner

Food and Drug Administration

10903 New Hampshire Avenue

Silver Spring, M.D. 20993

Dear Commissioner Califf,

Thank you for your efforts to ensure food safety at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For decades, the FDA has been the gold standard for approving and regulating medical products and food. Yet this year, the actions of the FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) has raised questions regarding its ability to fulfill its core oversight responsibilities. The safety of, and access to, infant formula should be among CFSAN’s highest priorities, as this food is vital for the growth and development of infants. To this end, we write to request a response from FDA on its activities that may have contributed to the exacerbated infant formula shortages and specific questions in the following paragraphs. It is our responsibility as U.S. Senators to do everything with our authority to hold the FDA accountable and legislate in areas that will enable the agency to meet the expectations of the American people. 

Our hearts and prayers are with the parents and their families whose babies tragically died due to infant formula bacterial contamination. We understand and want to support the FDA in thoroughly evaluating all reported and potential infant formula contaminations. However, based on the timeline and where we are today, it is unclear as to why nearly three months have gone by and the FDA has failed to expeditiously conduct and conclude its investigation. On February 17, Abbott Nutrition initiated a proactive, voluntary recall of three of its powdered formulas manufactured at their facility in Michigan following four consumer complaints of potential Cronobacter bacteria contamination.^[1] The following day, FDA warned consumers not to use these products.^[2] On April 15, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded the bacteria isolated from two of the sick infants and the Michigan facility had no connection. And as of last week, no connection has been found, yet the facility remains idle.^[3], [4]

We are also concerned as to why FDA leadership failed to be proactive in mitigating the shortage crisis parents are now facing. The COVID-19 pandemic revealed many vulnerabilities across all sectors of industry, and our food supply chain was woefully unprepared to handle challenges here and from foreign partners. Infant formula supplies at local grocery stores were relatively stable for the first half of 2021. The out-of-stock percentage started to climb steadily in the later half and continued to worsen throughout this year.^[5] Abbott Nutrition’s voluntary recall exacerbated the shortage, and yet no policies were taken to mitigate the sharp increases to the current out-of-stock 43 percent the Administration is now scrambling to address. It’s also concerning that FDA and key officials in the Administration did not anticipate this crisis or take action within days following Abbott Nutrition’s voluntary recall considering the company holds 48.1 percent of the U.S. market in infant formula.^[6]

Families are getting to the brink of pursuing unsafe and potentially dangerous options to feed their infants including homemade infant formula. And physicians are, once again, running defense on misinformation due to a lack of federal action to get the word out on safe alternatives.^[7], [8]^, [9]  In addition, the shortage will trickle into other federal agencies, diverting and stretching resources from other crises like illicit fentanyl. In April, the U.S. Customers and Border Protection (CBP) seized $30,000 worth of unapproved infant formula across 17 shipments at the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania port of entry.^[10]

Based on the timeline, it is unclear why federal health agencies have not been able to complete this investigation in a more expeditious manner or plan ahead to mitigate this additional supply chain disruption. Therefore we respectfully request your responses to the following questions:

1. The manufacturing facility in Michigan is segmented where manufacturing designated areas are required to adhere to specific safety and infection control standards. The facility also maintains areas that are administrative and do not directly handle manufacturing or exposure of open products. Please describe the areas in which the FDA has taken samples and how many samples were taken that would empirically validate the results of the investigation. In your explanation, please also include the expected timeline for each task and if CFSAN has met its obligations.
2. As noted in the paragraph above, the CDC concluded that the samples taken did not match the bacteria in the facility. How does the FDA partner with other agencies at the federal, state, and/or local level to expedite investigations to forestall potential supply chain crises? To what extent do other agencies or organizations advance or hinder a timely investigation?
3. Why has it taken more than three months to complete the obligations required to finalize a safety inspection?
4. At what point did the FDA alert the White House of the bacteria and the product recall?
5. Did the FDA, along with the White House, have a strategic plan in place to mitigate formula shortages? If yes, please provide a brief description, date of implementation, actions the agency has taken, and expected timelines to enable manufacturers to produce, process and deliver food during supply chain disruptions.
6. Did or has the FDA made any recommendations to the White House about what actions the agency can take to prepare or handle the shortage?
7. The manufacturing facility in Sturgis, Michigan is the only Abbott plant to produce specialized formula for infants with metabolic disorders. How is the FDA going to work with Abbott and other formula manufacturers to ensure that the special medical needs of infants can be met?
8. Abbott Nutrition, along with other infant formula manufacturers, have registered domestic and foreign sites to manufacture infant formula for interstate commerce in the U.S. Abbott Nutrition’s facility in Ireland is an FDA-registered facility. It also has several other facilities in the Netherlands, Spain, and France that manufacture infant formula. What steps has FDA taken to increase importation by accrediting more manufacturing facilities overseas?
9. At what point was the White House made aware that these importation options were available to ease the strain on domestic capacity?
10. Whose decision was it to ease these requirements on formula from foreign manufacturers?
11. In White House press briefings last week, the Press Secretary and others within the Biden Administration appeared to blame Abbott Nutrition for the deaths and shortages, despite the fact that the investigation is not concluded.^[11], [12] Did the FDA state to the White House that Abbott Nutrition was responsible for the illnesses or deaths?

The shortage, felt by all families in need, is disproportionately impacting vulnerable populations. As you know, Medicaid is a major source of coverage for low-income vulnerable populations including pregnant women, infants, and children. In 2020, Medicaid covered 42 percent of births.^[13] In addition, 49 percent of infants born in the U.S. participate in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.^[14] While breastfeeding has been on the rise, many infants rely on formula partially or as their sole source of food.